Chain Comparison: Overview of Key Layer 1 and Layer 2 Networks

·

In the fast-evolving world of blockchain technology, comparing the performance, adoption, and economic activity across different networks is essential for investors, developers, and enthusiasts. This comprehensive analysis dives into the core metrics that define leading Layer 1 (L1) and Layer 2 (L2) blockchains, offering a data-driven perspective on network revenue, application growth, and on-chain activity.

Whether you're evaluating Ethereum’s dominance, Solana’s speed, or the rise of ZK-powered rollups, understanding how these chains stack up provides critical insights into long-term viability and user adoption trends.

Understanding Network Revenue

Network revenue—the total value captured by a blockchain from transaction fees and out-of-protocol tips—is a key indicator of economic health. It reflects how much users are willing to pay to interact with the network, which correlates with demand and utility.

High network revenue often signals strong usage, whether from DeFi transactions, NFT mints, or smart contract executions. For example, Ethereum consistently ranks at the top due to its mature ecosystem and high base fees during peak congestion. In contrast, newer chains like Avalanche and Solana aim to offer lower costs while maintaining security and decentralization.

👉 Discover how real-time blockchain analytics can help you track network revenue trends across top chains.

When analyzing network revenue, it's important to distinguish between in-protocol fees (paid directly to validators or miners) and out-of-protocol tips, such as priority gas payments or MEV (Maximal Extractable Value). Chains with robust MEV tooling may show higher effective revenue even if base fees are low.

Application Revenue by Chain: Measuring Real-World Utility

While network revenue shows overall demand for blockspace, application revenue reveals where value is being generated within the ecosystem. This metric tracks how much income decentralized applications (dApps) generate for their protocols—such as swap fees in DEXs or interest spreads in lending platforms.

Data sourced from DefiLlama highlights stark differences across chains:

Application revenue is a strong proxy for sustainable ecosystem development. A chain might have low transaction fees to attract users, but without thriving dApps generating income, long-term growth remains uncertain.

Layer 1 Blockchains: The Foundation of Decentralization

Layer 1 networks form the base settlement layer of the blockchain stack. Each L1 makes trade-offs between scalability, security, and decentralization—commonly referred to as the “blockchain trilemma.”

Top Performing Layer 1 Networks

Each L1 caters to different user needs—from high-security environments to high-speed trading floors.

Layer 2 Solutions: Scaling Ethereum’s Ecosystem

As Ethereum’s popularity drives up gas fees, Layer 2 solutions have emerged to scale transaction throughput while preserving security. Built atop Ethereum, L2s bundle transactions off-chain before settling them on the mainnet.

Leading Layer 2 Networks

The race among L2s isn’t just about speed—it’s about ecosystem building. Successful L2s attract developers, users, and capital through grants, partnerships, and UX improvements.

👉 Explore live dashboards tracking TVL, fees, and user activity across all major L2 networks.

Sector Insights: Finance and Consumer Applications

Beyond infrastructure, the real innovation happens at the application layer.

Decentralized Finance (DeFi)

Protocols like MakerDAO, Morpho, Hyperliquid, and Raydium demonstrate how financial primitives are being reimagined. From algorithmic stablecoins to peer-to-contract derivatives, DeFi continues to expand access to global financial services.

Cross-chain liquidity platforms such as Orca (on Solana) and Lifinity show how concentrated liquidity models improve capital efficiency.

Consumer-Facing dApps

User-friendly applications are driving mass adoption:

These apps lower entry barriers and attract non-crypto-native users—a crucial step toward mainstream adoption.

Chain Clusters: The Rise of Interconnected Ecosystems

New paradigms like the OP Superchain and ZKsync Elastic Network represent a shift toward interconnected blockchains. Instead of isolated networks, we’re seeing clusters of chains sharing technology, sequencers, or messaging layers.

This modular approach enables:

Such ecosystems could become the dominant model for Web3 scalability in 2025 and beyond.

Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs: Bridging Crypto with Traditional Markets

The approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs marked a watershed moment for institutional adoption. These products allow traditional investors exposure to BTC without custody risks.

Now, eyes turn to Ethereum ETFs, which could unlock billions in new capital if approved. Analysts watch regulatory developments closely, as ETH’s classification as a commodity rather than a security plays a pivotal role.

ETFs not only boost liquidity but also validate blockchain assets as legitimate investment vehicles.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: What is the difference between network revenue and application revenue?
A: Network revenue refers to fees earned by validators/miners from transaction processing. Application revenue is income generated by dApps (e.g., trading fees), which stays within the protocol rather than going to the underlying chain.

Q: Why are Layer 2 networks important?
A: L2s scale Ethereum by handling transactions off-chain, reducing congestion and lowering fees while inheriting Ethereum’s security—making DeFi and NFTs more accessible.

Q: Which blockchain has the highest application revenue?
A: As of recent data, Ethereum leads in total application revenue due to its large, mature DeFi ecosystem.

Q: How do ETFs impact cryptocurrency markets?
A: ETFs bring institutional-grade investment vehicles to crypto, increasing liquidity, price stability, and regulatory legitimacy—especially for Bitcoin and potentially Ethereum.

Q: Are newer blockchains like Aptos or Berachain worth watching?
A: Yes. While they haven’t matched Ethereum or Solana in adoption yet, their novel architectures (like parallel execution or native yield) could attract niche use cases or future breakthrough apps.

Q: What role does MEV play in network revenue?
A: MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) allows validators to optimize transaction ordering for profit. It contributes significantly to effective network revenue, especially on high-volume chains.


👉 Stay ahead of market shifts with real-time blockchain analytics and on-chain intelligence tools.